Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport vs Stark Varg SM: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg SM is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 13.4 in (341 mm) longer (57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm)), its seat sits 6.9 in (175 mm) higher, and it weighs 144 lb (66 kg) more.
With a 29.9 in (760 mm) seat, riders around 5'1" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'6" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg SM, with a 36.8 in (935 mm) seat, riders around 6'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'9" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport bigger than the Stark Varg SM?
No. The Stark Varg SM has the longer wheelbase, 57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport or the Stark Varg SM?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport, at 29.9 in (760 mm) vs 36.8 in (935 mm) for the Stark Varg SM, a 6.9 in (175 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport vs the Stark Varg SM?
Roughly: the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport suits riders from about 5'1" (balls of feet down) and the Stark Varg SM from about 6'4". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport or the Stark Varg SM?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport: 130 lb (59 kg) vs 274 lb (125 kg) for the Stark Varg SM. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.