Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport vs RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus: which is bigger?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 8.3 in (210 mm) longer (52.8 in (1,340 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm)), its seat sits 6.1 in (154 mm) higher, and it weighs 60 lb (27 kg) more.
With a 29.9 in (760 mm) seat, riders around 5'1" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'6" and up can flat-foot it. On the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus, with a 36 in (914 mm) seat, riders around 6'2" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'8" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport bigger than the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
No. The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus has the longer wheelbase, 52.8 in (1,340 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport, at 29.9 in (760 mm) vs 36 in (914 mm) for the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus, a 6.1 in (154 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport vs the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
Roughly: the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport suits riders from about 5'1" (balls of feet down) and the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus from about 6'2". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport: 130 lb (59 kg) vs 190 lb (86 kg) for the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus has the higher claimed top speed: 62 mph vs 55 mph.