79Bike Falcon Pro vs Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport: which is bigger?
The 79Bike Falcon Pro is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 4.7 in (120 mm) longer (49.2 in (1,250 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm)), its seat sits 2.8 in (70 mm) higher.
With a 29.9 in (760 mm) seat, riders around 5'1" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'6" and up can flat-foot it. On the 79Bike Falcon Pro, with a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the 79Bike Falcon Pro bigger than the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport?
Yes. The 79Bike Falcon Pro has the longer wheelbase, 49.2 in (1,250 mm) vs 44.5 in (1,130 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon Pro or the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport, at 29.9 in (760 mm) vs 32.7 in (830 mm) for the 79Bike Falcon Pro, a 2.8 in (70 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon Pro vs the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport?
Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon Pro suits riders from about 5'7" (balls of feet down) and the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport from about 5'1". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon Pro or the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport?
The 79Bike Falcon Pro: 130 lb (59 kg) vs 130 lb (59 kg) for the Electro & Co ETM RTR Sport. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The 79Bike Falcon Pro has the higher claimed top speed: 56 mph vs 55 mph.