Stomp EBOX 2.0 vs 79Bike Falcon Lite: which is bigger?
The 79Bike Falcon Lite is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 12 in (305 mm) longer (49.2 in (1,250 mm) vs 37.2 in (945 mm)), its seat sits 6.7 in (170 mm) higher, and it weighs 39 lb (18 kg) more.
With a 26 in (660 mm) seat, riders around 4'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 4'9" and up can flat-foot it. On the 79Bike Falcon Lite, with a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Stomp EBOX 2.0 bigger than the 79Bike Falcon Lite?
No. The 79Bike Falcon Lite has the longer wheelbase, 49.2 in (1,250 mm) vs 37.2 in (945 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Stomp EBOX 2.0 or the 79Bike Falcon Lite?
The Stomp EBOX 2.0, at 26 in (660 mm) vs 32.7 in (830 mm) for the 79Bike Falcon Lite, a 6.7 in (170 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Stomp EBOX 2.0 vs the 79Bike Falcon Lite?
Roughly: the Stomp EBOX 2.0 suits riders from about 4'4" (balls of feet down) and the 79Bike Falcon Lite from about 5'7". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Stomp EBOX 2.0 or the 79Bike Falcon Lite?
The Stomp EBOX 2.0: 99 lb (45 kg) vs 138 lb (63 kg) for the 79Bike Falcon Lite. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The 79Bike Falcon Lite has the higher claimed top speed: 52 mph vs 32 mph.