Stark Varg SM vs RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg SM is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 5.2 in (131 mm) longer (57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 52.8 in (1,340 mm)), its seat sits 0.8 in (21 mm) higher, and it weighs 85 lb (39 kg) more.
With a 36 in (914 mm) seat, riders around 6'2" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'8" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg SM, with a 36.8 in (935 mm) seat, riders around 6'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'9" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Stark Varg SM bigger than the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
Yes. The Stark Varg SM has the longer wheelbase, 57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 52.8 in (1,340 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Stark Varg SM or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus, at 36 in (914 mm) vs 36.8 in (935 mm) for the Stark Varg SM, a 0.8 in (21 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Stark Varg SM vs the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
Roughly: the Stark Varg SM suits riders from about 6'4" (balls of feet down) and the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus from about 6'2". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Stark Varg SM or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus: 190 lb (86 kg) vs 274 lb (125 kg) for the Stark Varg SM. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.