Stark Varg SM vs E Ride Pro SS 2.0: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg SM is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 8.3 in (211 mm) longer (57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)), its seat sits 4.1 in (105 mm) higher, and it weighs 136 lb (62 kg) more.
With a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg SM, with a 36.8 in (935 mm) seat, riders around 6'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'9" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Stark Varg SM bigger than the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
Yes. The Stark Varg SM has the longer wheelbase, 57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Stark Varg SM or the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
The E Ride Pro SS 2.0, at 32.7 in (830 mm) vs 36.8 in (935 mm) for the Stark Varg SM, a 4.1 in (105 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Stark Varg SM vs the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
Roughly: the Stark Varg SM suits riders from about 6'4" (balls of feet down) and the E Ride Pro SS 2.0 from about 5'7". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Stark Varg SM or the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
The E Ride Pro SS 2.0: 139 lb (63 kg) vs 274 lb (125 kg) for the Stark Varg SM. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.