Stark Varg MX vs RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg MX is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 5.5 in (140 mm) longer (58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 52.8 in (1,340 mm)), its seat sits 1.3 in (33 mm) higher, and it weighs 71 lb (32 kg) more.
With a 36 in (914 mm) seat, riders around 6'2" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'8" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg MX, with a 37.3 in (947 mm) seat, riders around 6'5" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'10" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Stark Varg MX bigger than the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
Yes. The Stark Varg MX has the longer wheelbase, 58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 52.8 in (1,340 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Stark Varg MX or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus, at 36 in (914 mm) vs 37.3 in (947 mm) for the Stark Varg MX, a 1.3 in (33 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Stark Varg MX vs the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
Roughly: the Stark Varg MX suits riders from about 6'5" (balls of feet down) and the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus from about 6'2". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Stark Varg MX or the RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus?
The RFN Warrior Pro SX-E15 Plus: 190 lb (86 kg) vs 260 lb (118 kg) for the Stark Varg MX. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.