Stark Varg MX vs Electro & Co ETM RTR XL: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg MX is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 11.8 in (300 mm) longer (58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 46.5 in (1,180 mm)), its seat sits 5.4 in (137 mm) higher, and it weighs 115 lb (52 kg) more.
With a 31.9 in (810 mm) seat, riders around 5'5" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'10" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg MX, with a 37.3 in (947 mm) seat, riders around 6'5" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'10" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the Stark Varg MX bigger than the Electro & Co ETM RTR XL?
Yes. The Stark Varg MX has the longer wheelbase, 58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 46.5 in (1,180 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the Stark Varg MX or the Electro & Co ETM RTR XL?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR XL, at 31.9 in (810 mm) vs 37.3 in (947 mm) for the Stark Varg MX, a 5.4 in (137 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the Stark Varg MX vs the Electro & Co ETM RTR XL?
Roughly: the Stark Varg MX suits riders from about 6'5" (balls of feet down) and the Electro & Co ETM RTR XL from about 5'5". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the Stark Varg MX or the Electro & Co ETM RTR XL?
The Electro & Co ETM RTR XL: 145 lb (66 kg) vs 260 lb (118 kg) for the Stark Varg MX. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.