E Ride Pro SS 3.0 vs Stark Varg SM: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg SM is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 8.3 in (211 mm) longer (57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)), its seat sits 4.1 in (105 mm) higher, and it weighs 107 lb (49 kg) more.
With a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg SM, with a 36.8 in (935 mm) seat, riders around 6'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'9" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 bigger than the Stark Varg SM?
No. The Stark Varg SM has the longer wheelbase, 57.9 in (1,471 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 or the Stark Varg SM?
The E Ride Pro SS 3.0, at 32.7 in (830 mm) vs 36.8 in (935 mm) for the Stark Varg SM, a 4.1 in (105 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 vs the Stark Varg SM?
Roughly: the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 suits riders from about 5'7" (balls of feet down) and the Stark Varg SM from about 6'4". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 or the Stark Varg SM?
The E Ride Pro SS 3.0: 168 lb (76 kg) vs 274 lb (125 kg) for the Stark Varg SM. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.