E Ride Pro SS 3.0 vs 79Bike Falcon GT: which is bigger?
The E Ride Pro SS 3.0 and 79Bike Falcon GT are almost the same size: their wheelbases are within 0 in (0 mm) of each other (49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)). Where they differ, the 79Bike Falcon GT is the one where its seat sits 0.4 in (10 mm) lower and it weighs 15 lb (7 kg) less.
With a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it. On the 79Bike Falcon GT, with a 32.3 in (820 mm) seat, riders around 5'6" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'11" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 bigger than the 79Bike Falcon GT?
They're nearly identical in size. Wheelbase: 49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 or the 79Bike Falcon GT?
The 79Bike Falcon GT, at 32.3 in (820 mm) vs 32.7 in (830 mm) for the E Ride Pro SS 3.0, a 0.4 in (10 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 vs the 79Bike Falcon GT?
Roughly: the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 suits riders from about 5'7" (balls of feet down) and the 79Bike Falcon GT from about 5'6". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the E Ride Pro SS 3.0 or the 79Bike Falcon GT?
The 79Bike Falcon GT: 152 lb (69 kg) vs 168 lb (76 kg) for the E Ride Pro SS 3.0. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The E Ride Pro SS 3.0 has the higher claimed top speed: 60 mph vs 59 mph.