79Bike Falcon Pro vs Stark Varg MX: which is bigger?
The Stark Varg MX is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 9.1 in (230 mm) longer (58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 49.2 in (1,250 mm)), its seat sits 4.6 in (117 mm) higher, and it weighs 130 lb (59 kg) more.
With a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it. On the Stark Varg MX, with a 37.3 in (947 mm) seat, riders around 6'5" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'10" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the 79Bike Falcon Pro bigger than the Stark Varg MX?
No. The Stark Varg MX has the longer wheelbase, 58.3 in (1,480 mm) vs 49.2 in (1,250 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon Pro or the Stark Varg MX?
The 79Bike Falcon Pro, at 32.7 in (830 mm) vs 37.3 in (947 mm) for the Stark Varg MX, a 4.6 in (117 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon Pro vs the Stark Varg MX?
Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon Pro suits riders from about 5'7" (balls of feet down) and the Stark Varg MX from about 6'5". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon Pro or the Stark Varg MX?
The 79Bike Falcon Pro: 130 lb (59 kg) vs 260 lb (118 kg) for the Stark Varg MX. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.