79Bike Falcon GT vs Tromox MC10 size

1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft5′10″Falcon GT49.6 in wheelbaseMC1054.6 in wheelbase
Height ft in Weight lb
Silhouettes traced from manufacturer photos, scaled to spec wheelbase

79Bike Falcon GT vs Tromox MC10: which is bigger?

The Tromox MC10 is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 5 in (126 mm) longer (54.6 in (1,386 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)), its seat sits 2.8 in (70 mm) higher, and it weighs 75 lb (34 kg) more.

With a 32.3 in (820 mm) seat, riders around 5'6" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'11" and up can flat-foot it. On the Tromox MC10, with a 35 in (890 mm) seat, riders around 6'0" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'5" and up can flat-foot it.

Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.

Questions

Is the 79Bike Falcon GT bigger than the Tromox MC10?

No. The Tromox MC10 has the longer wheelbase, 54.6 in (1,386 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).

Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Tromox MC10?

The 79Bike Falcon GT, at 32.3 in (820 mm) vs 35 in (890 mm) for the Tromox MC10, a 2.8 in (70 mm) difference.

How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon GT vs the Tromox MC10?

Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon GT suits riders from about 5'6" (balls of feet down) and the Tromox MC10 from about 6'0". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.

Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Tromox MC10?

The 79Bike Falcon GT: 152 lb (69 kg) vs 227 lb (103 kg) for the Tromox MC10. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.

Which is faster?

The 79Bike Falcon GT has the higher claimed top speed: 59 mph vs 56 mph.

More 79Bike Falcon GT comparisons

More Tromox MC10 comparisons