79Bike Falcon GT vs Stomp EBOX 2.0: which is bigger?
The 79Bike Falcon GT is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 12.4 in (315 mm) longer (49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 37.2 in (945 mm)), its seat sits 6.3 in (160 mm) higher, and it weighs 53 lb (24 kg) more.
With a 26 in (660 mm) seat, riders around 4'4" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 4'9" and up can flat-foot it. On the 79Bike Falcon GT, with a 32.3 in (820 mm) seat, riders around 5'6" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'11" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the 79Bike Falcon GT bigger than the Stomp EBOX 2.0?
Yes. The 79Bike Falcon GT has the longer wheelbase, 49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 37.2 in (945 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Stomp EBOX 2.0?
The Stomp EBOX 2.0, at 26 in (660 mm) vs 32.3 in (820 mm) for the 79Bike Falcon GT, a 6.3 in (160 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon GT vs the Stomp EBOX 2.0?
Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon GT suits riders from about 5'6" (balls of feet down) and the Stomp EBOX 2.0 from about 4'4". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Stomp EBOX 2.0?
The Stomp EBOX 2.0: 99 lb (45 kg) vs 152 lb (69 kg) for the 79Bike Falcon GT. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The 79Bike Falcon GT has the higher claimed top speed: 59 mph vs 32 mph.