79Bike Falcon GT vs E Ride Pro SS 2.0: which is bigger?
The 79Bike Falcon GT and E Ride Pro SS 2.0 are almost the same size: their wheelbases are within 0 in (0 mm) of each other (49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)). Where they differ, the E Ride Pro SS 2.0 is the one where its seat sits 0.4 in (10 mm) higher and it weighs 13 lb (6 kg) less.
With a 32.3 in (820 mm) seat, riders around 5'6" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'11" and up can flat-foot it. On the E Ride Pro SS 2.0, with a 32.7 in (830 mm) seat, riders around 5'7" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'0" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the 79Bike Falcon GT bigger than the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
They're nearly identical in size. Wheelbase: 49.6 in (1,260 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
The 79Bike Falcon GT, at 32.3 in (820 mm) vs 32.7 in (830 mm) for the E Ride Pro SS 2.0, a 0.4 in (10 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon GT vs the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon GT suits riders from about 5'6" (balls of feet down) and the E Ride Pro SS 2.0 from about 5'7". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the E Ride Pro SS 2.0?
The E Ride Pro SS 2.0: 139 lb (63 kg) vs 152 lb (69 kg) for the 79Bike Falcon GT. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.
Which is faster?
The E Ride Pro SS 2.0 has the higher claimed top speed: 62 mph vs 59 mph.