79Bike Falcon GT vs Arctic Leopard XE Pro R: which is bigger?
The Arctic Leopard XE Pro R is the bigger bike. Its wheelbase is 1.6 in (40 mm) longer (51.2 in (1,300 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm)), its seat sits 2 in (50 mm) higher, and it weighs 22 lb (10 kg) more.
With a 32.3 in (820 mm) seat, riders around 5'6" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 5'11" and up can flat-foot it. On the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R, with a 34.3 in (870 mm) seat, riders around 5'10" and up can get the balls of both feet down once suspension sag is counted, and riders around 6'4" and up can flat-foot it.
Silhouettes are traced from manufacturer side-profile photos and scaled so the wheel-to-wheel distance matches the published wheelbase, so small parts like mirrors and fenders may be off by a few percent.
Questions
Is the 79Bike Falcon GT bigger than the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R?
No. The Arctic Leopard XE Pro R has the longer wheelbase, 51.2 in (1,300 mm) vs 49.6 in (1,260 mm).
Which has the lower seat height, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R?
The 79Bike Falcon GT, at 32.3 in (820 mm) vs 34.3 in (870 mm) for the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R, a 2 in (50 mm) difference.
How tall do you need to be for the 79Bike Falcon GT vs the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R?
Roughly: the 79Bike Falcon GT suits riders from about 5'6" (balls of feet down) and the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R from about 5'10". Shorter riders manage both with lowering links or a slimmer seat. Enter your height above to see yourself next to both.
Which is lighter, the 79Bike Falcon GT or the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R?
The 79Bike Falcon GT: 152 lb (69 kg) vs 174 lb (79 kg) for the Arctic Leopard XE Pro R. Manufacturers don't all weigh the same way, so treat small gaps as a wash.